[email | nyoom meetings | neighbors | fan comments on her novels | chance encounters | text or calls if you're one of the few people who have her number]
And somewhat. He has enough trauma that he could use it an excuse for any inconvenient behavior. Even so, he's a person, he should have a name for people to call him by.
The outfit is really something. I wonder if that's a hold over from his original personality or if it was someone else's idea. I can imagine the character doing it.
...So it's like a story within a story? He's a fictional character in your visions, but then fiction becomes reality there, and so does he? And he goes from being the protagonist to becoming a support character in your visions?
Re: [267, 7pm]
Have you thought about why he might be avoiding that?
Re: [267, 7pm]
And somewhat. He has enough trauma that he could use it an excuse for any inconvenient behavior. Even so, he's a person, he should have a name for people to call him by.
Re: [267, 7pm]
He gave me the Deuteragonist name first, but I disagreed with it.
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
He has the perfect energy for the main love interest in a dark romance. Why doesn't he see it?
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
What? I wouldn't ship you with him. What do you take me for? An UNPOV fan?
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Oh, is that where you were going earlier? He's a character in the book your vision guy was reading?
Re: [267, 7pm]
Yes, he's the protagonist.
Or, his vision guy is the protagonist. But he's pretty heavily embraced the visions.
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
I don't know the full details, but my vision guy and his vision guy reach the end of the story together, somehow.
Re: [267, 7pm]
The end of the story, but not the end of their story, right?
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
That reminds me of a conversation I had a few days ago. I hope he doesn't find it offensive if you don't agree, at least.
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Yes.
Re: [267, 7pm]
Was it Yue?
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
1/2
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]
Re: [267, 7pm]